White privilege most certainly exists.
As does male privilege, heterosexual privilege, Christian privilege,
and middle-class privilege. Not to mention the less acknowledge
privileges for those who have children, are married, and dare I say,
people who are of an “acceptable” or so called “healthy”
weight. The straight, married, middle-class WASPS who go to the gym
three times a week have it all in terms of privilege. But as someone
who has some of these privileges, but can suffer because I don't have
them all, I feel I take a different stance towards the idea of
privilege.
The WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant)
is a gender – especially the heterosexual, married variety. And as
we know from Butler, we all fail at maintaining these genders. We can
never fully be the gender we think we are. We never truly fit. I'm
sure from the outside I may seem WASPy, but while I may be a White
Anglo-Saxon male, I am not Protestant, not heterosexual, barely
middle-class, with no intention of participating in “legal”
marriage or having children – and well, depending on what bar I
walk into (Blake's or WetBar versus Woof's or The Eagle) I may be
obese or thin.
I'm not angry about the privileges I do
get, because I don't think about them (that's the nature of
privilege!!!); but I also have no guilt for them either. If fact, the
only privilege I find to be truly problematic is institutionalized
privilege. Universities, schools, jobs, laws that privilege are the
things that need to be disrupted. These are the things that need to
be problematized. This is not to say that I think smaller more
localized places shouldn't have their privileges disrupted as well;
in fact, I call for the Twinks to raid the Bear bars, the Bears to
raid the Lesbian bars, Drag Queens to join the church choir, Lesbians
to kick the doors down at the ManKind Project, and I invite people of
all races to Black Gay Pride and then a drink at Bulldogs afterword
where we can crown Miss Transgender Heterosexual Mister Leather Ursa
Dyke... yup I said it. As fun as that would be, and as much as I
would like to be at the after party for all those invasions, I don't
feel like breaking down the walls of men's only and women's only
spaces is really what needs to be done.
In the Freakanomics documentary they
discuss white privilege in an interesting way... in terms of names.
One study found that the more “ethnic” (read is black) a name is,
the less likely you are to be called for a job interview. It goes
further into terms of the spelling of a name: Tony is more likely to
get a job interview than Toni, or Tonee (that means only one out of
three Tony, Toni, Tonee's gets called for an interview – dear god,
I hope someone gets the joke there).
lol, yep i get it!
ReplyDeletethe other characteristic of having privilege is that we are reluctant to give any of the benefits it brings up so that others might in turn benefit. so, we "burr up" and "dig in."